Skip to content

Conversation

@BrianLusina
Copy link
Owner

@BrianLusina BrianLusina commented Nov 13, 2025

Describe your change:

Adds a factory static method to the binary search tree data structure to enable constructing a binary search tree from a sorted list of items

  • Add an algorithm?
  • Fix a bug or typo in an existing algorithm?
  • Documentation change?

Checklist:

  • I have read CONTRIBUTING.md.
  • This pull request is all my own work -- I have not plagiarized.
  • I know that pull requests will not be merged if they fail the automated tests.
  • This PR only changes one algorithm file. To ease review, please open separate PRs for separate algorithms.
  • All new Python files are placed inside an existing directory.
  • All filenames are in all lowercase characters with no spaces or dashes.
  • All functions and variable names follow Python naming conventions.
  • All function parameters and return values are annotated with Python type hints.
  • All functions have doctests that pass the automated testing.
  • All new algorithms have a URL in its comments that points to Wikipedia or other similar explanation.
  • If this pull request resolves one or more open issues then the commit message contains Fixes: #{$ISSUE_NO}.

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features
    • Added a new method to construct binary search trees from sorted lists, enabling efficient tree initialization from pre-sorted data.

@BrianLusina BrianLusina self-assigned this Nov 13, 2025
@BrianLusina BrianLusina added Algorithm Algorithm Problem Binary Search Binary Search Algorithm Trees labels Nov 13, 2025
@coderabbitai
Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 13, 2025

Walkthrough

A new static method construct_bst is added to the BinarySearchTree class that builds a balanced BST from a sorted list using recursive divide-and-conquer. The method designates the middle element as the root and recursively constructs left and right subtrees from the corresponding sublists.

Changes

Cohort / File(s) Summary
Binary Search Tree Enhancement
datastructures/trees/binary/search_tree/__init__.py
Added construct_bst static method that builds a balanced BinarySearchTree from a sorted list using recursive middle-pivot construction

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Caller as Caller
    participant Public as construct_bst()
    participant Helper as _construct_helper()
    participant BST as BinarySearchTree

    Caller->>Public: sorted_list
    rect rgb(200, 220, 240)
        note over Public: Validate input
        Public->>Public: Check if list is empty
    end
    
    Public->>Helper: Call helper(list, 0, len-1)
    rect rgb(220, 240, 220)
        note over Helper: Divide & Conquer
        Helper->>Helper: mid = (left + right) / 2
        Helper->>Helper: Create node at mid
        Helper->>Helper: Recurse left (0 to mid-1)
        Helper->>Helper: Recurse right (mid+1 to end)
    end
    
    Helper->>Public: Return constructed root
    Public->>BST: Wrap root in BinarySearchTree
    BST->>Caller: Return new BST instance
Loading

Estimated code review effort

🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~20 minutes

  • Review the recursive divide-and-conquer logic for correctness (boundary conditions, base cases, middle calculation)
  • Verify that empty input is handled correctly (returns None)
  • Check edge cases: single-element lists, even/odd-length lists
  • Ensure the algorithm produces a balanced tree structure from the sorted input

Possibly related PRs

Suggested labels

Datastructures

Poem

🐰 With sorted lists we now can play,
A BST springs forth mid-way,
Divide and conquer, left then right,
Our balanced trees are built just right! 🌳

Pre-merge checks and finishing touches

❌ Failed checks (1 warning)
Check name Status Explanation Resolution
Docstring Coverage ⚠️ Warning Docstring coverage is 50.00% which is insufficient. The required threshold is 80.00%. You can run @coderabbitai generate docstrings to improve docstring coverage.
✅ Passed checks (2 passed)
Check name Status Explanation
Title check ✅ Passed The title clearly and specifically describes the main change: adding a method to construct a minimum-height binary search tree from a sorted list.
Description check ✅ Passed The description is comprehensive and covers all required sections. It clearly describes the change, appropriately marks the checklist items, and demonstrates adherence to repository guidelines.
✨ Finishing touches
  • 📝 Generate docstrings
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
  • Create PR with unit tests
  • Post copyable unit tests in a comment
  • Commit unit tests in branch feat/datastructures-construct-bst

📜 Recent review details

Configuration used: CodeRabbit UI

Review profile: CHILL

Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between b78b639 and cbf8f62.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • datastructures/trees/binary/search_tree/__init__.py (1 hunks)
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (1)
datastructures/trees/binary/search_tree/__init__.py (1)
datastructures/trees/binary/node.py (1)
  • BinaryTreeNode (6-184)
🔇 Additional comments (1)
datastructures/trees/binary/search_tree/__init__.py (1)

30-41: Balanced construction looks solid.

The midpoint selection plus index-based recursion yields the expected minimal-height BST without extra list slicing, and the base case cleanly terminates recursion. Nicely done.


Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out.

❤️ Share

Comment @coderabbitai help to get the list of available commands and usage tips.

@BrianLusina BrianLusina added the Datastructures Datastructures label Nov 13, 2025
@BrianLusina BrianLusina merged commit 3a081e7 into main Nov 13, 2025
6 of 8 checks passed
@BrianLusina BrianLusina deleted the feat/datastructures-construct-bst branch November 13, 2025 09:52
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Algorithm Algorithm Problem Binary Search Binary Search Algorithm Datastructures Datastructures Trees

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants